Bryant & May And The Memory Of Blood by Christopher Fowler

Memory Of BloodRobert Kramer, theatrical producer, is hosting a party in his central London penthouse to celebrate the launch of his trashy new West End play, The Two Murderers. The rain is beating down outside but everyone seems to be enjoying themselves. Until, that is, a tragedy ensues. The door to Kramer’s infant son’s nursery is locked from the inside. Once the door is broken down, the window is found wide open, the baby is missing and a antique Mr Punch puppet is lying on the floor. It seems that life has imitated art – for in the puppet show, Mr Punch throws the baby out of the window…

The Peculiar Crimes Unit may have a new lease of life in their new offices – once home to Aleister Crowley – but as ever, they are in constant danger of being shut down. As they investigate the child’s murder, they start treading on toes as a Minister’s daughter was present at the party. Meanwhile the killer has barely begun their reign of terror…

The Bryant and May series has been going since 2004, with Full Dark House, and this is the ninth book. The tenth is already published (The Invisible Code) and the eleventh is imminent. For me, each one of the books has been a terrific read, but sometimes the mystery element is a little variable. Here, Christopher Fowler presents us with a classic whodunnit – but it’s so much more than that.

Full of larger than life characters, this book is a delight to read. I’ve described books before as being unable to put a book down – well, yesterday I went to the doctors taking the book with me for the waiting room and found myself still reading the book as I walked home. Luckily managed to avoid walking into any lamp posts – and I think I managed to put the book down while talking to the doctor…

One of the real triumphs of Fowler’s writing is that he makes Arthur Bryant, a detective who looks for solutions in the most unlikely places – a waxwork museum, for example – into a thoroughly believable character. Somehow this most unlikely of characters feels like a real person, and he’s a constant joy to read about. And when he realises that he may be responsible for… something… well, my heart went out to him.

In fact, all of the main characters get some development here – the relationships between two pairs of characters get some focus and move in one direction or another. A new plot strand that I presume will run into the next book is introduced, although not as overt a thread as the Mr Fox story that linked the last two books – this one should be able to support whatever plot the author wants to introduce.

The other thing… normally, I tend to tune out when there are discussions of the psychology of the murderer. Not here – these elements, where the team, and Bryant in particular, try to work out what the killer is playing at, are utterly riveting. Add in the historical elements , from Punch and Judy to the London theatre and this is a stunningly rich book.

One thing – the visual clue that finally gives the killer away really doesn’t translate into the written word. However, the killer is guessable at least – I spotted them, although partly because there’s an echo of a trick from an Agatha Christie book that made me look at them a bit too closely. That sort of thing happens when you read a lot of crime fiction, I’m afraid. It’s probably more of a one-theory-fits-all-the-facts solution than a what-does-this-clue-mean solution, which includes the locked room part.

But regardless, this is a fantastic read – totally engrossing, entertaining and Highly Recommended.

About these ads

About Puzzle Doctor

I'm a mathematician by nature and as such have always been drawn to the logical side of things. Hence my two main hobbies being classic mysteries and logical puzzling. Oh, and cats. No logic there, I'm afraid.
This entry was posted in Bryant and May, Christopher Fowler, Locked Rooms and Impossible Murders. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Bryant & May And The Memory Of Blood by Christopher Fowler

  1. richmcd says:

    I must admit I’m very keen to read this given all the praise it’s received, but I’ve only read the first three Bryant and May books and I found those a bit over-stretched and under-clued. If I skipped ahead to this one would it a) make any sense and b) ruin the intervening books if I decided to go back to them?

    • Not really but the flaws in the cluing are probably still there. I’d be interested in what you think of it though. A shame you’d skip books 4 and 5 though as they’re my favourites

      • richmcd says:

        Oh! Maybe I’ll read Ten Second Staircase next. I like the sound of that one too.

        I had the order wrong in my mind. I thought The Victoria Vanishes was fourth, and it’s been putting me off picking up the series again. Given that I’m not a massive fan of Fowler and I think The Moving Toyshop is very overrated, I wasn’t really looking forward to a tribute piece. They’re not exactly short books…

      • I thought The Victoria Vanishes was disappointing as the mechanism of making the pub vanish us very prosaic. Of course the whole point is the why, not the how…

        Ten Second Staircase was my first Fowler so I have fond memories of it.

  2. curtis evans says:

    These sorts of reviews always remind me I need to get caught up on Fowler’s fiction.

    • TomCat says:

      Same story here. I used to love the PCU books (and Bryant!), but never picked this one up when it came out. I’ll have to remedy that.

      However, I have to add that I thought the first four or so books, up to White Corridor, were superior to the ones up to Off the Rails. It felt like these wildly imaginative, neo-Victorian mysteries had morphed into standard police procedurals with weird elements, but the last few ones seem to be return to earlier ones.

  3. Santosh Iyer says:

    I am one-third through the book and really enjoying it. Not only suspenseful but also very humorous.The writing style is impressive. I shall comment further after finishing the book.

  4. Santosh Iyer says:

    I have finished reading the book and am totally disappointed with the ending and the solution.
    The final clue relating to the method of SPOILER is simply rubbish. A common method of SPOILER cannot be applied to all SPOILER——–there will certainly be exceptions. Most of the other clues are also unsatisfactory.
    Many interesting aspects of the case turn out to be complete blinds. There is an irrelevant strand (involving another murder) which is totally unnecessary and simply adds to the number of pages.
    The motive for the bizarre crimes is far-fetched. Even after the solution is revealed, the bizarre actions of the murderer seem incomprehensible, not making any sense.

    • I think that the clue you mention is perfectly reasonable but I’m not going into why without spoiling it – I’ve edited your comment to make it more obscure for people who haven’t read it. And the various strands are to support the imagery of the Grand Guignol, which pervades the entire book, including the murders and the motivation, giving a cohesive feel to the whole thing. Sorry that this wasn’t for you, but I have to disagree with your comments here. Yes, it’s no Agatha Christie-esque whodunnit, but it’s not trying to be. It’s a mystery novel for the 21st century that draws upon the rich past of Punch and Judy (and many other things) and a cracking read.

  5. Pingback: My Targets For 2014 | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

  6. Pingback: The Puzzly – The ISOTCMN Book Of The Month – February 2014 | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

  7. Martha Mahard says:

    May I just add that I love the Bryant and May series – not all of them work at a variety of levels, but the writing is rich with fascinating detail, the settings are vividly drawn, and the whole read is very satisfying. One more thing, the audio versions are superb! The reader, Tim Goodman, gives a terrific performance and I have now listened to a couple of them twice. Highly recommended.

    • I’m actually a little surprised that it hasn’t made the leap onto television with such rich characters – although could anyone really do Arthur justice?

      • marthamahard says:

        I admit to having cast Peter O’Toole as Bryant but haven’t come up with a good May. Since this is totally for my own entertainment I don’t mind casting from among the dearly departed, or completely against the authors descriptions!

      • Possibly too young, but maybe Bill Nighy as Bryant?

  8. Pingback: Bryant & May and The Invisible Code by Christopher Fowler | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s