The Sittaford Mystery by Agatha Christie

During a séance in Sittaford House, the Ouija board spells out “Captain Trevelyan Dead”. You’ll never guess what happens at roughly the same time to Captain Trevelyan in his house a few miles away at the same time? Bludgeoned to death with a draft excluder (honest), that’s what!

I’m not that well-read on non-Poirot or Marple Agatha Christie novels, so I thought I’d give this one a try. It’s from1931, only her 11th published novel, and so far, only The Murder of Roger Ackroyd is the only Christie “classic” to have been written. It dates from the time of the early Ellery Queen novels, but, unlike those, the year it is set in is fairly important. I can’t say why without giving away the murderer, but it certainly made me overlook something obvious that a reader of the time would not have done.

It’s a funny old thing this book – it’s a very quick read, which helps – as it’s absolutely full of red herrings. The first mystery is who the sleuth is going to be – at first it seems that it’s the Major who finds the body, then a perfectly competent policeman shows up and then the fiancée of the accused takes things over. I suppose by floating the responsibilities around (there’s also a reporter who investigates with the fiancée) it means you can include those characters more legitimately as suspects. The central plot is pretty slight – if you work out the point of the séance (and as I said before, if it were ghosts, then I wouldn’t be reading it) then you can fill in most of the blanks yourself. It’s not complicated – I think the “whodunit, why and how” is covered in about a page – they could teach Ellery a thing or two about conciseness – but the critical clue is introduced very late in the book. As such, you do feel a bit that you’ve read a lot of irrelevant fluff before you get to the end.

I’m reaching into spoiler territory here, which I’m not supposed to do, but I think Dame Agatha cheats with this one. Not a clever misdirection, but a downright cheat. I’ll put the relevant reference here – it’s the first page of chapter three – highlight it to read it, but this is a downright lie in terms of what is happening. Definitely not playing fair.

So, not a major work by Dame Agatha, but it passed the time. It probably would have worked a lot better with some of the characters cut out and presented as a short story. Not dreadful by any means, but there are better Christie novels out there by far. Bonus points, however, for not having the young lady and young man investigating the crime getting engaged/married by the end of the book – Carr could learn a thing or two from Dame Agatha.

One final thing, if you’ve seen ITV’s “Marple” version of this, it’s got a different murderer, so read the book anyway.

WHERE CAN I GET IT?

It’s still in print, as is all of Agatha Christie’s books, so any good bookshop. Or try your local library – always a treasure trove.

About these ads

About Puzzle Doctor

I'm a mathematician by nature and as such have always been drawn to the logical side of things. Hence my two main hobbies being classic mysteries and logical puzzling. Oh, and cats. No logic there, I'm afraid.
This entry was posted in Agatha Christie. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The Sittaford Mystery by Agatha Christie

  1. polecat says:

    SPOILER AHEAD

    Robert Barnard in his appreciation of Christie offers an interesting perspective on the solution of the mystery in this book. According to him, skiing in the 20s and 30s was what very rich people did in the Swiss Alps – i.e., mountain skiing. Apparently, no contemporary reader at the mention of a pair of skis would have connected it to the idea of cross-country skiing.

    • puzzledoctor says:

      That’s not the bit that I was speaking of when I referred to the dating of it. I’ll stay away from spoilers, but just say that I’d completely forgotten about inflation…

  2. J F Norris says:

    Nice review, Doc.

    When my best pal and I were tearing through Christie’s books back in the 1970s we had the most recent paperback version (called Murder at Hazelmoor in the US). The cover illustration had a blazing fireplace and something that definitely should not have been shown. It ruined one of the surprises. Another 1970s Dell edition about a year or so later also had the same object pictured. So a heads up to all who haven’t read this book: Don’t buy or read any of the Dell 1970s version called MURDER AT HAZELMOOR if you don’t want part of the solution ruined for you.

  3. kingofcrime says:

    Hi,

    Very nice website about Dame Agatha Christie.

    Maybe we can swap links on our sites?

    Would you like to put two links on your website? In return, I will put your link!

    My websites:

    http://www.queenofcrime.com (website about my AC collection)

    http://www.facebook.com/QueenOfCrime (website about the Queen of Crime Library)

    Thanks!

    Best wishes,

    Ralf

    The Netherlands

  4. Pingback: Half-Way House by Ellery Queen | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

  5. Pingback: Half-Way House by Ellery Queen | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

  6. Pingback: Ordeal by Innocence by Agatha Christie | In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s